There’s talk in the
media about missions to Mars, there has been ever since the moon landings 40
years ago. How would we fund such a trip, would we be able to overcome the
technological and psychological obstacles? These are all issues that now have
potential solutions. Mars One is a project that hopes to use reality TV funding to raise the cash.
So the audition
(sorry selection) process will be televised (as will the revolution but that's a different story). Their web site states “The online
application will consist of general information about the applicant, a
motivational letter, a resume and a one minute video in which the applicant
answers some given questions and explains why he or she should be among the
first humans who set foot on Mars.” I might even apply myself, surely a
dissipated, middle aged writer with poor eyesight and a dodgy beard would be
just what they need. What’s the worst that can happen, I get rejected? Hey, I’m
a struggling writer, I’m used to rejection.
audience
The process
continues with the obligatory medical checks but round three is the most
telling. “This round is the national selection round, which could be
broadcast on TV and internet in countries around the world. In each country,
20-40 applicants will participate in challenges that demonstrate their
suitability to become one of the first humans on Mars. The audience will select
one winner per country and Mars One experts will select additional participants
to continue to round four.” So it really is possible to see the selection
process turning into an audition and once the public becomes involved we are
talking about the full Big Brother experience. Will the first colonists of other
worlds be the most beautiful and handsome? Will the first children born on other
planets have square jaws, perfect clear skin and the blondest of hair?
Presumably the broadcast will continue right to the point where they land on
Mars, build their settlement and begin their existence on the red lifeless waste
that will be their new home for the rest of their lives.
We might imagine how their daily lives, of survival decisions
and scientific experimentation, are influenced by ratings. Will there be
a behind
the scenes struggle between the directors of the scientific programme
and the
media division, with the associated back stabbing and scandal? This
would make a great plot
for a film or TV series. In fact I think the film might already have
been made
and I think there was a series with a similar background. The series was
cancelled, I seem to remember, because the real world accountants pulled
the plug when ratings didn't take off. So what
happens when the audience figures for the real Mars landings drop off?
Actually, when you consider it, it would be
self-sustaining as lack of audience figures would put their funding at
risk,
which would put their lives at risk, and their audience would increase
with the likelihood of disaster. They would be on a constant knife edge
though. (Comparisons to
Columbus might break down when you consider he wasn’t reliant on a
constant
stream of funding from his supporters in Europe to ensure he had
survival
resources on board ship or in the new world.)
televised
But this is where the big issue arises. When the inevitable
disaster happens, when they have a catastrophic failure, or worse, a
slow demise
due to some equipment failure that can't be resolved in the eight months
it takes to resupply, how much will be televised? Doubtless the media
will debate the fact that this is what they might have expected and as
such the
colonisers/stars would want it to be broadcast, it's in their contract,
after all the royalties will go
to their families after their death.
Jack Barrow
Jack is embarking on a 39 day long trip across the UK today. He will send in posts from the road.
No comments:
Post a Comment